header-logo header-logo

11 May 2012
Issue: 7513 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Employment—Discrimination—Grounds of age

Seldon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes [2012] UKSC 16, [2012] All ER (D) 121 (Apr)

Supreme Court, Lord Hope DP, Lady Hale, Lord Brown, Lord Mance and Lord Kerr SCJJ, 25 Apr 2012

The Supreme Court considered the question of age discrimination in employment in the context of a specified retirement age for employees of a partnership.

Robin Allen QC, Richard O’Dair and Dee Masters (instructed by Equality and Human Rights Commission) for the employee. Thomas Croxford and Emily Neill (instructed by Clarkson Wright and Jakes LLP) for the defendant. Dinah Rose QC and Emma Dixon (instructed by Treasury Solicitors) for the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills (intervening). Declan O’Dempsey (instructed by Irwin Mitchell LLP) for Age UK (intervening).

In 1971, the employee joined the defendant law firm. He became an equity partner in 1972. The firm’s partners’ agreement stated that partners would retire at the age of 65. The employee wished to continue to work for three more years and, in early 2006, he suggested to the defendant that he continue to work as a salaried

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll