header-logo header-logo

23 November 2012
Issue: 7539 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Employment—Demotion—Facebook posts

Smith v Trafford Housing Trust [2012] EWHC 3221 (Ch)

High Court, Chancery Division, Briggs J, 16 November 2012

A claimant has successfully brought an action for breach of contract against his employer for breach of contract, arising out of his demotion following Facebook comments on his wall. A reasonable reader of the claimant’s Facebook wall page could not rationally conclude that the comments had been made in any relevant sense on the defendant’s behalf or that they would damage the defendant’s reputation.

Hugh Tomlinson QC (instructed by Aughton Ainsworth) for the claimant. Andrew Short QC (instructed by Devonshires Solicitors) for the Trust.

The claimant was employed as a housing manager by the defendant, which was a private housing trust. In February 2011, he placed a link on his Facebook page to a BBC news article about gay marriages in church, and added the comment “an equality too far”. On the same day one of his Facebook friends responded with the comment “Does this mean you don’t approve” to which he later responded: “No not really, I don’t understand why people

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll