header-logo header-logo

18 June 2014
Issue: 7611 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Employment claims drop

Employment tribunal claims, which nosedived by nearly 80% after the government introduced tribunal fees last year, have not picked up.

Ministry of Justice (MoJ) figures for January to March 2014 show 5,619 single claims (those made by a sole employee) were lodged, compared with 13,491 in the same period in 2013.

Unison is pursuing judicial review proceedings against the MoJ on the basis the fees make it excessively difficult to enforce employment rights and therefore breach the EU principle of effectiveness. Its case failed at first instance because the judge felt it was too early to assess the impact.

Geoffrey Mead, partner at Eversheds, says: “It is clear the fees regime is having a significant impact on the level of claims.” He predicted that, if the government were to introduce changes, they would “most likely” be a fee reduction rather than wholesale repeal.

 

Issue: 7611 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll