header-logo header-logo

23 March 2007
Issue: 7265 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

EMPLOYMENT

Babula v Waltham Forest College [2007] EWCA Civ 174, [2007] All ER (D) 98 (Mar)

Where an employee alleges his dismissal was automatically unfair because he made a protected disclosure, he has to establish a reasonable belief that the information being disclosed tends to show one or more of the situations identified in the Employment Rights Act 1996, sub-ss 43B(1)(a) to (f). A tribunal hearing a claim for automatic unfair dismissal has to make three key findings:

(i) whether or not the employee believed that the information he was disclosing met the criteria set out in one or more of sub-ss 43B(1)(a) to (f);
(ii) whether or not, objectively, that belief was reasonable; and
(iii) whether or not the disclosure was made in good faith.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll