header-logo header-logo

Employment

02 June 2017
Issue: 7748 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Hartley and others v King Edward VI College [2017] UKSC 39, [2017] All ER (D) 146 (May)

The Supreme Court, in allowing the appellants’ appeal, held that the correct interpretation of ‘accruing from day to day’ within s 2 of the Apportionment Act 1870 meant accruing calendar day by calendar day and that that principle could not be excluded in the present case upon the correct interpretation of the relevant employment contracts. The appellants had participated in one day or lawful strike action and had a deduction of their salary at a rate of 1/260 of their annual salary. It was held that that had been wrong and the rate ought to have been a deduction of 1/365 of their annual salary.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

A good book, a glass of chilled Albarino, and being creative for pleasure help Liz McGrath balance the rigours of complex bundles and being Head of Chambers

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Firm welcomes director in its financial services financial regulatory team

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Partner appointment in firm’s equity capital markets team

NEWS

Walkers and runners will take in some of London’s finest views at the 16th annual charity event

Law school partners with charity to give free assistance to litigants in need

Could the Labour government usher in a new era for digital assets, ask Keith Oliver, head of international, and Amalia Neenan FitzGerald, associate, Peters & Peters, in this week’s NLJ

An extra bit is being added to case citations to show the pecking order of the judges concerned. Former district judge Stephen Gold has the details, in his ‘Civil way’ column in this week’s NLJ

The Labour government’s position on alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is not yet clear

back-to-top-scroll