header-logo header-logo

14 October 2016
Issue: 7718 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Employment

British Gas Trading Ltd v Lock and another [2016] EWCA Civ 983, [2016] All ER (D) 49 (Oct)

The Court of Appeal dismissed an employer’s appeal against an interpretation by the employment tribunal of reg 16 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 (SI 1998/1833). The effect of that interpretation was to deem a “commission or similar payment” case that, but for such additional paragraph, would fall within s 221(2) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 as instead falling within s 221(3) and so to bring into play the 12 week averaging exercise for which it provided. That meant that the employee’s holiday pay was to be calculated to include an element referable to the amount of results-based commission he normally earned.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll