header-logo header-logo

27 September 2013
Issue: 7577 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Employment

Johnson v Oldham Metropolitan Borough Council [2013] All ER (D) 187 (Sep)

It was well established that it was a critical aspect of fairness that a party should know the case it had to meet. It was also a central tenet of justice that disputes should be heard where a fair hearing was possible and cases should not lightly be ruled out on a procedural technicality without determination on the merits. One way in which case management powers could be exercised in such a case would be to order particulars of the claim or response to be given.  If they were not given in response to such an order, whether through misunderstanding, mental illness, lack of awareness of that which the other party would need to meet the claim or response, or a deliberate refusal or failure to comply, an “unless order” might be made.  If such an order was not complied with within its terms by the date set out in the order, the claim or response would stand struck out without the need for any further order. It was also well established that the scope of discretion

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll