header-logo header-logo

08 February 2013
Issue: 7547 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Employment

Sivanandan and others v Hackney London Borough [2013] EWCA Civ 22, [2013] All ER (D) 234 (Jan)

The Civil Liability (Contribution) Act 1978 (CLIA 1978) was concerned, as the title indicated, with the notion of one tortfeasor recovering contribution from another tortfeasor, or from other tortfeasors, liable in respect of the same damage, whether jointly with him or otherwise. CLIA 1978 did not deal with the allocation, as between different tortfeasors, of different degrees of responsibility to the claimant for the damage suffered. As the Employment Appeal Tribunal pointed out, it was not settled at present whether the employment tribunal had jurisdiction over contribution claims, or whether there would have to be separate contribution proceedings in the county court.

The decision in Way [2005] ICR 1362 had been cited as recognising the existence of a discretion exercisable by the ET either (a) to apportion liability for the total sum awarded to a claimant as between the different respondents to a claim, or (b) to make a joint and several award under which each respondent would be liable to the claimant for the full amount of the award.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll