header-logo header-logo

17 May 2012
Issue: 7514 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Employment

Morris v Royal Bank of Scotland plc UKEAT/0436/10/MAA, [2012] All ER (D) 53 (May)

 

Section 1(a) of the Race Relations Act 1976 provided for a two-part test, namely whether the complainant had been treated less favourably than another person had, or would have been, treated and, if so, whether the treatment was on racial grounds. It remained the law that what a tribunal was concerned with, at least in a case of the instant kind, was the mental process of the relevant decision-maker or his or her motivation in order to establish the grounds on which he or she had acted.
 
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Jack Kelly

Gateley Legal—Jack Kelly

Gateley Legal expands Midlands residential development team

Gibson Dunn—Richard Surtees

Gibson Dunn—Richard Surtees

Gibson Dunn adds employee benefits and executive compensation practice in London with partner Richard Surtees

Laytons ETL—Alec Cameron

Laytons ETL—Alec Cameron

Laytons ETL appoints new partner and head of intellectual property disputes

NEWS
A series of recent decisions has clarified important principles across property law, from perpetuities to lease renewals and public rights over land
A series of recent decisions has clarified important principles across property law, from perpetuities to lease renewals and public rights over land
Employers cannot rely on wellbeing services alone to defend workplace stress claims after a High Court decision awarding almost £1m to an overworked employee
Andy Burnham's brand of 'Manchesterism' could offer fresh thinking on legal aid and access to justice if it reaches Westminster, according to Roger Smith, NLJ columnist and former director of JUSTICE
The constitutional fallout from a change of prime minister, rather than the politics, is under scrutiny as questions arise over the limits of executive authority in a leadership transition
back-to-top-scroll