header-logo header-logo

10 November 2011
Issue: 7489 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Employment

Kay v Cheadle Royal Healthcare Ltd t/a Affinity Healthcare UKEAT/0060/11/CEA, [2011] All ER (D) 05 (Nov)

It was well established that tribunals should concentrate on the question of whether it was reasonable in the circumstances to dismiss the employee whose claim was under consideration, and should treat arguments based on disparity with care. There would not be many cases where the evidence supported the proposition that there were other cases which were truly similar, or sufficiently similar, to afford an adequate basis for arguing that there had been a disparity. Such an argument was only likely to succeed if it could be shown that the tribunal’s evaluation of the evidence before it had been perverse, which was essentially a complaint about the tribunal’s findings of fact.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Jack Kelly

Gateley Legal—Jack Kelly

Gateley Legal expands Midlands residential development team

Gibson Dunn—Richard Surtees

Gibson Dunn—Richard Surtees

Gibson Dunn adds employee benefits and executive compensation practice in London with partner Richard Surtees

Laytons ETL—Alec Cameron

Laytons ETL—Alec Cameron

Laytons ETL appoints new partner and head of intellectual property disputes

NEWS
A series of recent decisions has clarified important principles across property law, from perpetuities to lease renewals and public rights over land
A series of recent decisions has clarified important principles across property law, from perpetuities to lease renewals and public rights over land
Employers cannot rely on wellbeing services alone to defend workplace stress claims after a High Court decision awarding almost £1m to an overworked employee
Andy Burnham's brand of 'Manchesterism' could offer fresh thinking on legal aid and access to justice if it reaches Westminster, according to Roger Smith, NLJ columnist and former director of JUSTICE
The constitutional fallout from a change of prime minister, rather than the politics, is under scrutiny as questions arise over the limits of executive authority in a leadership transition
back-to-top-scroll