header-logo header-logo

10 November 2011
Issue: 7489 / Categories: Features , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Employment

Nolan v Balfour Beatty Engineering Services UKEAT/0109/11/SM, [2011] All ER (D) 09 (Nov)

When deciding what would have been a reasonable time within which to present a late claim, employment tribunals were required to bear in mind the context, namely a primary time limit of three months and the general principle that litigation should be progressed efficiently and without delay. They were then required to consider all the circumstances of the particular case, an exercise which would inevitably include taking account of what the claimant did and what he knew about time limits, what he, reasonably, ought to have known about them, and they were required to ask themselves why it was that the further delay had occurred.

 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Jack Kelly

Gateley Legal—Jack Kelly

Gateley Legal expands Midlands residential development team

Gibson Dunn—Richard Surtees

Gibson Dunn—Richard Surtees

Gibson Dunn adds employee benefits and executive compensation practice in London with partner Richard Surtees

Laytons ETL—Alec Cameron

Laytons ETL—Alec Cameron

Laytons ETL appoints new partner and head of intellectual property disputes

NEWS
A series of recent decisions has clarified important principles across property law, from perpetuities to lease renewals and public rights over land
A series of recent decisions has clarified important principles across property law, from perpetuities to lease renewals and public rights over land
Employers cannot rely on wellbeing services alone to defend workplace stress claims after a High Court decision awarding almost £1m to an overworked employee
Andy Burnham's brand of 'Manchesterism' could offer fresh thinking on legal aid and access to justice if it reaches Westminster, according to Roger Smith, NLJ columnist and former director of JUSTICE
The constitutional fallout from a change of prime minister, rather than the politics, is under scrutiny as questions arise over the limits of executive authority in a leadership transition
back-to-top-scroll