header-logo header-logo

Employment

17 March 2011
Issue: 7457 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Ashby and others v Birmingham City Council [2011] EWHC 424 (QB), [2011] All ER (D) 48 (Mar) Queen’s Bench Division Slade J 3 Mar 2011

A court considering whether to strike out an equal pay claim or counterclaim under s 2(3) of the Equal Pay Act 1970 engaged in a two stage process. First, it would decide whether the claim could more conveniently be disposed of separately by an employment tribunal. If the court concluded that the claim could be more conveniently disposed of separately by an employment tribunal it would decide whether to exercise discretion to strike out the claim. Consideration should be given to the facts and circumstances of the particular proceedings and claims before the court.

Proceedings based on an equality clause were based on claims for breach of contract. The appropriateness of disposal of an equal pay claim in an employment tribunal was not determined by whether other claims were included in the proceedings. However, the fact that the only claim in court proceedings was for equal pay was a factor which could be taken into account in determining the questions posed by s 2(3).

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

A good book, a glass of chilled Albarino, and being creative for pleasure help Liz McGrath balance the rigours of complex bundles and being Head of Chambers

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Firm welcomes director in its financial services financial regulatory team

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Partner appointment in firm’s equity capital markets team

NEWS

Walkers and runners will take in some of London’s finest views at the 16th annual charity event

Law school partners with charity to give free assistance to litigants in need

Could the Labour government usher in a new era for digital assets, ask Keith Oliver, head of international, and Amalia Neenan FitzGerald, associate, Peters & Peters, in this week’s NLJ

An extra bit is being added to case citations to show the pecking order of the judges concerned. Former district judge Stephen Gold has the details, in his ‘Civil way’ column in this week’s NLJ

The Labour government’s position on alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is not yet clear

back-to-top-scroll