header-logo header-logo

17 March 2011
Issue: 7457 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Employment

Ashby and others v Birmingham City Council [2011] EWHC 424 (QB), [2011] All ER (D) 48 (Mar) Queen’s Bench Division Slade J 3 Mar 2011

A court considering whether to strike out an equal pay claim or counterclaim under s 2(3) of the Equal Pay Act 1970 engaged in a two stage process. First, it would decide whether the claim could more conveniently be disposed of separately by an employment tribunal. If the court concluded that the claim could be more conveniently disposed of separately by an employment tribunal it would decide whether to exercise discretion to strike out the claim. Consideration should be given to the facts and circumstances of the particular proceedings and claims before the court.

Proceedings based on an equality clause were based on claims for breach of contract. The appropriateness of disposal of an equal pay claim in an employment tribunal was not determined by whether other claims were included in the proceedings. However, the fact that the only claim in court proceedings was for equal pay was a factor which could be taken into account in determining the questions posed by s 2(3).

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll