header-logo header-logo

23 March 2007
Issue: 7265 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

EMPLOYMENT

YMCA Training v Stewart [2007] IRLR 185

In determining whether the requirements of step one of the statutory dismissal and disciplinary procedure are met, it is necessary to look beneath the parties’ own labels and focus on whether the substantive requirements of the statute were met.

Tribunals must not be distracted by the fact that the parties may have been following an internal procedure with more elaborate requirements, and different terminology, from those required by the statute. It does not matter that the requirements of both step one and step two are addressed in the same letter. The statutory procedure permits the employer to present its case in two stages—stating the grounds first and supplying the basis for them later—but it does not oblige the employer to do so.

Employers may state both the grounds for the contemplated action and the basis of those grounds at the same time. It is inherent in the requirements of step two that the employer should not announce any decision until the employee has had the opportunity to put their case at the meeting, but if such an opportunity is given, the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll