header-logo header-logo

09 April 2009 / Christopher De Mauny
Issue: 7364 / Categories: Features , Property , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employee patents

Just rewards & employee brilliance: getting the right fit. Christopher de Mauny reports

* * * * * *

The decision in Kelly v GE Healthcare [2009] All ER (D) 114 (Feb) should be of interest to anyone advising technology undertakings or the employees of such undertakings. Without delving into the detail of patent law, a new technical invention may be lead to entitlement to a patent. If the legal conditions for patentability are satisfied a patent confers on its owner the exclusive right to commercialise the subject matter of the patented invention for twenty years: it is a statutory monopoly for that product or process. Thus the decision may also be of interest to advisors of undertakings who are not technology undertakings as such but who conduct any kind of in-house product development that has a technical rather than aesthetic character.

Under the Patents Act 1977 (PA 1977) inventions made by employees in the course of their employment usually belong to their employer. Section 39(1) of PA 1977 provides that an employee's invention belongs to his employer where it was made in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll