header-logo header-logo

14 May 2020
Categories: Legal News , Banking , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Empathy pays dividends, banks discover

Banks need to rethink their complaints handling and use a more ‘human touch’ if they are to avoid repeating the mistakes of the 2008 financial crisis, an independent dispute resolution body has advised

A live pilot has been ongoing since the end of 2019, where banks make efforts to understand the personal circumstances of each SME, appoint a customer champion to each case to help customers identify the most important documents, and take account of their preferred means of communication. It has taken on board more than 40 complaints from SMEs so far, some stemming from the 2008 financial crisis.

The Business Banking Resolution Service (BBRS), a coalition of seven banks and other stakeholders who are running the pilot, published its interim findings in a report this week. It concluded that the findings indicate that the system needs to be reformed to take the stress and acrimony out of disputes.

According to the report, ‘the BBRS team initially focusses on conversations by phone to interact with customers and learn about the individual complaints, rather than burdening customers with filling in lengthy complaint forms at the very outset.

‘The emphasis is on balancing the need for collecting enough vital information about the complaint as early as possible while not losing the human touch and treating customers with empathy.’ The team also recognises the extra stress caused by the COVID-19 pandemic and the devastating impact this is having on business activity.

Lewis Shand Smith, the BBRS independent Chair, said: ‘It has never been more important for British businesses to get fair treatment from their banks.

‘Doing so will, in turn, safeguard the reputation of the sector. The BBRS will play a vital role in making sure this happens. In establishing our service, we have recognised the need for a deep rethink of the way disputes between SMEs and their banks are handled.

‘The live pilot is adopting a human and flexible approach, as an alternative to the stress and cost of seeking to resolve complaints through the courts.’

Alexandra Marks, Chief Adjudicator at the BBRS, said: ‘We have been discovering a lot about some difficult and often distressing cases, and the importance of handling these sensitively as well as fairly.

‘When dealing with disputes it is not possible to please everyone all of the time, but our ambition as an independent organisation is to reach fair and reasonable outcomes which bring closure to both parties.’

Find out more at: https://thebbrs.org.

Read the report, ‘Live pilot: interim findings’, at: https://staging-thebbrs.kinsta.cloud/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/BBRS_Live_Pilot_Interim_Report_15_05_2020.pdf.

 

Categories: Legal News , Banking , Commercial
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll