header-logo header-logo

14 May 2020
Categories: Legal News , Banking , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Empathy pays dividends, banks discover

Banks need to rethink their complaints handling and use a more ‘human touch’ if they are to avoid repeating the mistakes of the 2008 financial crisis, an independent dispute resolution body has advised

A live pilot has been ongoing since the end of 2019, where banks make efforts to understand the personal circumstances of each SME, appoint a customer champion to each case to help customers identify the most important documents, and take account of their preferred means of communication. It has taken on board more than 40 complaints from SMEs so far, some stemming from the 2008 financial crisis.

The Business Banking Resolution Service (BBRS), a coalition of seven banks and other stakeholders who are running the pilot, published its interim findings in a report this week. It concluded that the findings indicate that the system needs to be reformed to take the stress and acrimony out of disputes.

According to the report, ‘the BBRS team initially focusses on conversations by phone to interact with customers and learn about the individual complaints, rather than burdening customers with filling in lengthy complaint forms at the very outset.

‘The emphasis is on balancing the need for collecting enough vital information about the complaint as early as possible while not losing the human touch and treating customers with empathy.’ The team also recognises the extra stress caused by the COVID-19 pandemic and the devastating impact this is having on business activity.

Lewis Shand Smith, the BBRS independent Chair, said: ‘It has never been more important for British businesses to get fair treatment from their banks.

‘Doing so will, in turn, safeguard the reputation of the sector. The BBRS will play a vital role in making sure this happens. In establishing our service, we have recognised the need for a deep rethink of the way disputes between SMEs and their banks are handled.

‘The live pilot is adopting a human and flexible approach, as an alternative to the stress and cost of seeking to resolve complaints through the courts.’

Alexandra Marks, Chief Adjudicator at the BBRS, said: ‘We have been discovering a lot about some difficult and often distressing cases, and the importance of handling these sensitively as well as fairly.

‘When dealing with disputes it is not possible to please everyone all of the time, but our ambition as an independent organisation is to reach fair and reasonable outcomes which bring closure to both parties.’

Find out more at: https://thebbrs.org.

Read the report, ‘Live pilot: interim findings’, at: https://staging-thebbrs.kinsta.cloud/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/BBRS_Live_Pilot_Interim_Report_15_05_2020.pdf.

 

Categories: Legal News , Banking , Commercial
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll