Dermot Feenan explores the topic of judicial tears
The reported shedding of tears by Mr Justice Dingemans during sentencing in the recent Becky Watts case raises important issues about the role and behaviour of a judge, not limited to criminal proceedings. Is judicial crying incompatible with the office of the judge? Is it an excusable response to exposure to pain and suffering?
The case involved the killing of 16-year-old Becky Watts by Nathan Matthews and Sharon Hoare. The defendants abducted Watts for a sexual purpose. They suffocated her before placing her body in the boot of Matthews’ car. He then used a circular saw to cut her body into pieces before wrapping the pieces in cling film and plastic bags. Matthews and Hoare were convicted of murder and manslaughter respectively.
As the judge neared the conclusion of his sentencing remarks, he paid tribute to the family of the deceased. His voice trembled. There were tears in his eyes. He rose and swiftly left the court.
The judge’s tears were widely reported in the media. A judge who sheds tears seems unusual. Judges are traditionally seen
