header-logo header-logo

26 September 2019 / Stephen Lewis
Issue: 7857 / Categories: Features , Profession , Technology
printer mail-detail

Electronic execution—what you need to know

Stephen Lewis discusses the Law Commission’s work on electronic execution of documents & why they’ve confirmed that electronic signatures are a viable alternative to handwritten signatures

Earlier this month, the Law Commission of England and Wales published its report ‘Electronic execution of documents’. Our work addresses the use of electronic documents by commercial parties and consumers, including trust deeds and lasting powers of attorney (LPAs).

Our report aims to address uncertainty around electronic signatures by providing an accessible explanation of the law in the increasingly digitalised 21st century. However, we do not seek to mandate or encourage the use of electronic signatures in any particular situation.

Electronic signatures in use

Businesses and individuals are already using electronic signatures on contracts every day. But despite this frequent use, stakeholders told us about their lingering uncertainty over the legal validity of documents executed electronically, particularly where a signature has to be witnessed. They also raised practical concerns which can discourage some people from using this technology. These include:

  • Concerns that electronic signatures are more susceptible to fraud than handwritten signatures, which
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll