header-logo header-logo

14 March 2014
Issue: 7598 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Electricity

National Grid Electricity Transmission Plc v Arnold White Estates Ltd [2014] EWCA Civ 216, [2014] All ER (D) 16 (Mar)

The right to compensation under para 7(1) of Sch 4 to the Act was conferred in general language. The only limitation which might be said to flow from the language used was that the loss for which compensation was claimed had to be loss suffered by the claimant in his capacity as owner or occupier of the land, rather than in some wholly unrelated capacity. The established authorities had repeatedly emphasised that it was by reference to the value to the owner of the land being acquired that compensation was quantified, rather than its objective market value. That principle was fully applicable to the grant of wayleaves. In the instant case, the loss of a contractual right to proceeds of the sale of the land under a conditional contract, where the contract had fallen away because of the grant of the wayleave, had been fairly and squarely a loss suffered by the respondent in its capacity as owner of the land. It was by the transfer of the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll