header-logo header-logo

Effective disputes

31 January 2008 / Pablo Cortes
Issue: 7306 / Categories: Features , EU , ADR
printer mail-detail

Small value claims in cross-border disputes should soon be more cost-effective, says Pablo Cortes

The European Council’s adoption of the proposal for a regulation establishing a European Small Claims Procedure (PE-CONS 3604/07), should ensure that from January next year cross-border disputes between citizens are resolved more effectively. The proposed Regulation deals with low value claims arising in cross-border disputes within the EU, and provides for the direct enforcement of contested decisions in any of the member states without the need for going through mutual recognition of judgments.

The new regime will cover civil and commercial matters, but will exclude a number of claims such as those related to revenue, customs, administrative matters, legal capacity, wills, etc. Under the proposal claims cannot exceed €2,000 in value, excluding interest and legal costs, and its success at this level will determine whether it will be used for higher claims in the future and in other areas, outside the civil and commercial law realm.
 

Technology matters

Currently, information and communication technology (ICT) is not used extensively in the majority of judicial procedures in the EU. However, some

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll