header-logo header-logo

24 November 2011
Issue: 7491 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Education—Special education needs—Age at which statement of special education needs lapses

Williams v Essex County Council [2011] EWCA Civ 1315, [2011] All ER (D) 127 (Nov)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Maurice Kay, Moses LJJ and Baron J, 15 Nov 2011

A statement of special educational needs automatically lapses when a person turns 19 years of age, and thereby ceases to be a child.

Fiona Scolding (instructed by Essex County Council) for the authority. David Wolfe (instructed by Levenes) for the claimant.

The claimant was born in August 1989. She had Down’s Syndrome, and her functional age was about 10 years or less. In February 2008, the defendant local authority wrote to the claimant’s parents stating that they would cease to maintain the statement of special educational needs after she turned 19. The parents did not accept that decision. In subsequent proceedings the issue arose as to the age at which a local authority’s responsibilities in respect of maintaining a statement came to an end.

Baron J

The issue was of general importance because there were in excess of 230,000 children in England

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll