header-logo header-logo

17 February 2011
Issue: 7453 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Education secretary forced to reconsider spending cuts

Decision to revoke £1bn of funding for school repairs unlawful

Decision to revoke £1bn of funding for school repairs unlawful
A High Court judge has quashed Education Secretary Michael Gove’s proposal to cancel funding for schools under the Building Schools for the Future (BSF) programme.

BSF, which began in 2004, aimed to rebuild or refurbish schools across the entire secondary school estate.

The secretary of state revoked £1bn of funding and adopted “rules-based criteria” to determine which school repairs should go ahead and which should be stopped.

In R (Luton Borough Council and Ors v Secretary of State for Education [2011] EWHC 217 (Admin), six local authorities challenged Gove’s decision on the basis he had failed to conduct proper consultation, to consider their individual circumstances and to comply with his duties under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 and the Race Relations Act 1976.

They contended that he had acted irrationally and had breached their legitimate expectation that funding would continue.

The six authorities, represented by barristers from Brick Court Chambers, had built schools with BSF funding and had other schools in various stages

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll