header-logo header-logo

20 November 2008
Issue: 7346 / Categories: Opinion , Property
printer mail-detail

The edge of reason

Stuart Johnston & Simon Rutman offer some practical advice relating to plans and boundaries

Property owners have a fixed idea of what they assume is the physical extent of their property. However, this notion may not reflect the legal situation and when disputes arise between neighbours over land that they both claim to own, in the words of Lord Hoffman in Alan Wibberley Building Limited v Insley [1999] 1 WLR 894: “Feelings run high and disproportionate amounts of money are spent. Claims to small and valueless pieces of land are pressed with the zeal of Fortinbras’s army. It is therefore important that the law on boundaries should be as clear as possible.”

Plans
Land Registry’s requirements In the case of registered land, the first point of reference when trying to establish the extent of a property will be the Land Registry’s official copy of the registered title plan.

The Land Registry’s Practice Guide 40 provides comprehensive guidance on their requirements for plans at first registration. The following is a brief summary:

Plans must be drawn to and show an appropriate metric scale and show orientation.

Dimensions

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll