header-logo header-logo

09 September 2016
Issue: 7713 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The "Economic activities" VAT test

A training centre was engaged in economic activities despite its charitable purpose and therefore liable to pay VAT, the Court of Appeal has held.

In Longridge on the Thames v HMRC [2016] EWCA Civ 930, the Court considered whether VAT was payable on the construction of a training centre for outdoor activities which worked with young people and charged users according to ability to pay. The training centre, Longridge, sought to recover £135,000 worth of VAT that it had paid on the construction, on the grounds the building would be used for charitable purposes.

HMRC contended that Longridge was engaged in business activities. It argued that, according to European Court of Justice caselaw, the test for determining whether there is economic activity and therefore VAT payable is whether there is a “direct link between the service the recipient receives and the payment which he makes, not on the wider context in which the payment is made”.

The Court of Appeal agreed with HMRC, even though payments to Longridge did not reflect the full cost of the service.

Delivering the lead judgment, Lady Justice Arden said: “Economic activity is assessed objectively and so the concern of Longridge, which is its reason for providing the services which it does provide, is not enough to convert what would otherwise be economic activity into an activity of a different kind for VAT purposes.”

Issue: 7713 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll