header-logo header-logo

20 April 2012 / Christopher Warenius
Issue: 7510 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Easy does it?

Will reform resolve the legal minefield of easements by prescription, asks Christopher Warenius

Most property owners would agree that the law relating to easements by prescription can be a bit of a minefield. It has, as the Law Commission’s consultation paper Making Land Work: Easements, Covenants and Profits a Prendre suggests, “become too complex over decades and even centuries”.

The Court of Appeal’s judgment in London Tara Hotel v Kensington Close Hotel [2011] EWCA Civ 1356, [2011] All ER (D) 180 (Nov) illustrates the difficulties encountered in practice. The consultation paper seeks to overhaul the current law, but would the landowner in Tara be treated any differently?

Facts

In 1973, London Tara Hotel (LTH) granted a licence to Kensington Close Limited, the owner of the Kensington Close Hotel (KCH), providing for rights to use the service road belonging to LTH in consideration of an annual £1 payment, if demanded. In 1980, unknown to LTH, KCH changed ownership but use of the service road continued, even though the licence had been granted to, and was personal to, Kensington Close Limited, the former owner.
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll