header-logo header-logo

22 November 2013
Issue: 7585 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Easements

Evans v Wimbledon & Putney Commons Conservators [2013] EWHC 3411 (Admin), [2013] All ER (D) 110 (Nov)

It was established law that the defendant had power to grant an easement over the commons for the benefit of adjoining land provided the easement did not interfere with the ability of members of the public to continue to enjoy the part of the common over which the easement was granted and provided, too, that the easement granted was consistent with the duties of the defendant as specified in the Act and the overall objectives of the Act. Accordingly, rights which were granted by the defendant which had as their aim the maintaining and preserving of such an easement had to be permissible, subject to the same qualifications. 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll