header-logo header-logo

E-protection for authors & artists

16 September 2019
Categories: Legal News , Intellectual property , Media , Technology
printer mail-detail
The resale of e-books is unlawful under EU law, according to an Advocate General’s opinion.

The opinion, delivered last week in Tom Kabinet (C-263/18), a Dutch referral, will be welcomed by rightsholders of digital works protected by copyright, including music, films and games as well as e-books, Zoey Forbes, associate in technology, media and entertainment at Harbottle & Lewis, said.

The case arose when Tom Kabinet, an online second hand e-book seller, was sued by the Dutch Publishers Association and the General Publishers Group in a dispute over the extent of distribution rights and the rule of exhaustion. The case centres on when copyright of digital property can be said to be exhausted―is it after the first sale, or at a later stage?

Forbes said: ‘The Opinion also acknowledges the risks to rightsholders that may arise from a second-hand market for e-books, including cannibalisation of the primary market and the increased risk of piracy.

‘Although the Opinion is not binding on the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), it is rare for the CJEU to take a radically different stance, and we therefore expect the CJEU to reach a similar conclusion in its upcoming judgment. However, it is worth noting that the Advocate General recognises that the digitisation of content has upset the traditional balance between the rights of the user and the rightsholders and that there may be practical and policy reasons in favour of the resale of digital works, although the law and other arguments are to the contrary.

‘Much like the US courts in the case of Capitol Records v Redigi, he therefore firmly places any changes to the law in the hands of the EU legislature rather than the judiciary.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll