header-logo header-logo

E-discovery challenge

26 November 2009
Issue: 7395 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

In-house lawyers admit to being foxed when it comes to handling data for litigation or regulatory purposes.

Many corporate counsel consider their company policies and procedures to be unclear and unworkable, with less than one-fifth aware of the existence of policies for collecting and processing data.

Research by KPMG Forensic among more than 200 senior in-house lawyers across the world revealed significant concerns about handling data. 

Half of respondents were concerned about the legal department’s ability to find date and nearly two-fifths admitted it would be difficult to retrieve relevant data in the event of a regulatory investigation or major litigation.

Sixty per cent of respondents had concerns about costs, 56% worried about security issues, and a similar proportion were concerned about records management policies and data volumes.

Counsel felt most confident about dealing with employment and human resources matters and least equipped to cope with competition and
anti-trust investigations.

Communications between legal and IT departments was a major source of concern—more than one-fifth of legal departments were not consulted by IT about changes in storage capabilities, and one quarter are rarely or never consulted about new technologies for dealing with e-discovery.

Paul Tombleson, head of forensic technology at KPMG Forensic in the UK, said: “Companies have to deal with a mind-bogglingly large amount of data being generated every day, which not only has to be stored but made searchable and retrieveable in the future.

Issue: 7395 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll