header-logo header-logo

03 June 2022 / Michael L Nash
Issue: 7981 / Categories: Features , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Duty & dignity

83620
Michael L Nash shares his reflections on a remarkable reign

The powers and privileges of the British sovereign are many and various, and they derive from a multiplicity of sources. Those who criticise the exercise of these powers often do not know their origin, or how and why they are used. Queen Elizabeth II’s reign has not been without its controversies and scandals—Queen Victoria had her fair share and still came out on top. Why have these controversies arisen?

The answer lies in the nature of our constitution: lex scripta and lex non scripta, laws written and laws unwritten. In most other major European monarchies, the parameters of the powers and privileges of the sovereign are clearly defined in the constitution, which is found in one written document, and which began at one definite point in that nation’s history.

One must also remember the memories of powers exercised (generally without any question) in the dynasties from which they have come, and there have been quite a number of such dynasties. The one most potent in memory and exercise for a long

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

DWF—11 appointments

DWF—11 appointments

DWF strengthens North West teams with 11 newly qualified solicitors

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll