header-logo header-logo

09 November 2012 / Michael Salter , Chris Bryden
Issue: 7537 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Drawing the line

How far does the law protect employees from sexual harassment, ask Chris Bryden & Michael Salter

As the maelstrom surrounding Jimmy Savile engulfs the BBC and, if newspapers reports are to be believed, expands to other facets of the public sector, it is useful to consider how much the law has changed over a relatively short period of time and the potential exposure there may be for employers faced with allegations of sexual harassment.

In the employment context, the Equality Act 2010 (EqA 2010) and its predecessor legislation prohibited harassment on grounds of the protected characteristic and, in the case of the Sex Discrimination Act 1976, prohibited sexual harassment which was harassment of a sexual nature and which did not depend on the sex of the victim.

Establishing liability

Recently, in general terms, the law of tort has relaxed considerably the circumstances in which an employer can be liable for the torts of its employees. Gone are the days when an employer would be found not liable for their employee’s acts if those acts were deemed to be “frolics of their

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll