header-logo header-logo

Draft Damages-Based Agreements Regulations 2010

05 February 2010
Issue: 7403 / Categories: Legislation
printer mail-detail

Draft Damages-Based Agreements Regulations 2010

Prescribe the requirements with which an agreement between a client and a representative must comply in order to be an enforceable damages based agreement in an employment matter. Set out the requirements of the agreement, the information that must be given to the client before the agreement is signed and the form the agreement must take.

The Regulations also limit the fee the representative may charge to 35%, including VAT of the sum received by the client. The Regulations also specify certain requirements in the event that the agreement is terminated.

 

In force : 6 April 201

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

A good book, a glass of chilled Albarino, and being creative for pleasure help Liz McGrath balance the rigours of complex bundles and being Head of Chambers

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Firm welcomes director in its financial services financial regulatory team

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Partner appointment in firm’s equity capital markets team

NEWS

Walkers and runners will take in some of London’s finest views at the 16th annual charity event

Law school partners with charity to give free assistance to litigants in need

Could the Labour government usher in a new era for digital assets, ask Keith Oliver, head of international, and Amalia Neenan FitzGerald, associate, Peters & Peters, in this week’s NLJ

An extra bit is being added to case citations to show the pecking order of the judges concerned. Former district judge Stephen Gold has the details, in his ‘Civil way’ column in this week’s NLJ

The Labour government’s position on alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is not yet clear

back-to-top-scroll