header-logo header-logo

05 November 2025
Issue: 8138 / Categories: Legal News , Costs , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Double review on whiplash and fixed costs

Two separate post-implementation reviews are being held into the extension of fixed recoverable costs for personal injury claims and the whiplash regime

However, the Law Society has warned the consultation period is too short.

This week, the Civil Procedure Rule Committee launched a consultation on the extension of fixed recoverable costs in October 2023 from low-value claims only to cover most intermediate and fast track claims. The consultation closes on 5 January.

Law Society vice president Brett Dixon said: ‘We are concerned that the deadline for responses is very short.

‘It coincides with the call for evidence for the whiplash review and includes the Christmas break. We hope this gives government enough time to gather enough responses.’

Last week, the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) launched a post-implementation review of its whiplash policies, covering fixed tariffs, the Official Injury Claim portal, statutory definition of the injury, ban on settling cases without medical evidence and small claims limit. An MoJ call for evidence will close on 22 December, with the review due to be published in the spring.

Reforms to whiplash injury claims were introduced seven years ago by Part 1 of the Civil Liability Act 2018. Fixed tariffs were introduced where the injury or injuries lasted less than two years. Insurers and claimants were barred from settling claims before medical evidence had been produced. At the same time, the threshold for the small claims track was raised from £1,000 to £5,000 for road traffic accident claims, bringing many more cases within its remit.

Dixon said the portal got off to ‘a challenging start.

‘We remain concerned about the length of time it takes to resolve road traffic claims, particularly those involving whiplash injuries. With average settlement times now reported to be exceeding 600 days, there are serious questions about how cases are being managed within the portal.’

Issue: 8138 / Categories: Legal News , Costs , Personal injury
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll