header-logo header-logo

05 November 2025
Issue: 8138 / Categories: Legal News , Costs , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Double review on whiplash and fixed costs

Two separate post-implementation reviews are being held into the extension of fixed recoverable costs for personal injury claims and the whiplash regime

However, the Law Society has warned the consultation period is too short.

This week, the Civil Procedure Rule Committee launched a consultation on the extension of fixed recoverable costs in October 2023 from low-value claims only to cover most intermediate and fast track claims. The consultation closes on 5 January.

Law Society vice president Brett Dixon said: ‘We are concerned that the deadline for responses is very short.

‘It coincides with the call for evidence for the whiplash review and includes the Christmas break. We hope this gives government enough time to gather enough responses.’

Last week, the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) launched a post-implementation review of its whiplash policies, covering fixed tariffs, the Official Injury Claim portal, statutory definition of the injury, ban on settling cases without medical evidence and small claims limit. An MoJ call for evidence will close on 22 December, with the review due to be published in the spring.

Reforms to whiplash injury claims were introduced seven years ago by Part 1 of the Civil Liability Act 2018. Fixed tariffs were introduced where the injury or injuries lasted less than two years. Insurers and claimants were barred from settling claims before medical evidence had been produced. At the same time, the threshold for the small claims track was raised from £1,000 to £5,000 for road traffic accident claims, bringing many more cases within its remit.

Dixon said the portal got off to ‘a challenging start.

‘We remain concerned about the length of time it takes to resolve road traffic claims, particularly those involving whiplash injuries. With average settlement times now reported to be exceeding 600 days, there are serious questions about how cases are being managed within the portal.’

Issue: 8138 / Categories: Legal News , Costs , Personal injury
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll