header-logo header-logo

02 March 2012 / Jonathan Herring
Issue: 7503 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Double jeopardy?

When is a marriage not a marriage, asks Jonathan Herring

It is increasingly common to marry overseas. In 2010 around 74,000 couples did. Rarely does that cause legal problems, but it can do as Galloway v Goldstein [2012] EWHC 60 (Fam) demonstrates.

Married on two continents

The husband was English and his wife American. Perhaps concerned about the rates of marriage breakdown, or perhaps just for the fun of it, they decided to get married twice: once in Connecticut, US, in April 1999 and then again one month later in England. There would have been no problem if the English ceremony had been in the nature of a blessing. But, it was not, it was a full marriage, registered at the General Register Office of England and Wales. By 2004, the marriage had broken down and was dissolved by the Superior Court of Connecticut. The US proceedings made no mention of the English ceremony, but made appropriate financial orders.

Some years later, the husband became concerned about the status of the English ceremony. In particular, he was concerned that in the event of his

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll