header-logo header-logo

A double-edged sword

18 September 2008 / Michael L Nash
Issue: 7337 / Categories: Opinion , Public
printer mail-detail

Living in the public eye is an inevitable consequence of fame, says Michael Nash

In early August two matters brought a simmering ire to boiling point. These were the Max Mosley case, brought against the News of the World, and the report in the Evening Standard that the Duke of Edinburgh had prostate cancer, which led to a test case against the British media via the Press Complaints Commission (PCC).

The duke has long been at loggerheads with the press due to what he perceives are intrusions into royal privacy, but central to this issue is the key factor of what constitutes “public interest”. The duke is a public figure. He is the consort of the head of state and the father of the heir to the throne. He cannot pretend to be a private figure, although of course, like everyone, he has a private life. The trouble is that the private lives of public figures are of interest to all. This is the price of fame or public status.

This is of course not the whole picture. British or English law long

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll