header-logo header-logo

02 July 2020 / Dr Michael Arnheim
Issue: 7893 / Categories: Features , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Don’t blame the judges!

23520
Dr Michael Arnheim advocates the need for Parliament (not judges) to step into the law-making breach

In brief

  • Under our constitution, policy-making at the national level is the responsibility of democratically-elected governments and ministers accountable to Parliament, not of unelected judges .
  • Why Parliament should assert its power to guide judges by means of legislation, on the basis of the sovereignty of Parliament, the bedrock principle of the UK Constitution.

Two recently retired UK Supreme Court (UKSC) justices have highlighted the serious plight of English law. Lord Sumption has expressed concern at ‘our persistent habit of looking for legal solutions to what are really political problems’. (Trials of the State, 2019, Location 857). This results in unelected judges making decisions that should be made by a democratically elected parliament or government.

Lord Neuberger focused on the different but equally serious phenomenon of the ‘disarray and a marked lack of reliable principle’ in the field of tort, (https://bit.ly/3iiu86W) which was shown in my recent book Anglo-American Law: A Comparison (2019) to infect many other

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll