header-logo header-logo

24 June 2022 / Danielle Reece-Greenhalgh
Issue: 7984 / Categories: Features , Family , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Domestic abuse: casting a wider net

85508
Does the ever-expanding scope of domestic abuse law risk creating confusion & inconsistency in prosecution? Danielle Reece-Greenhalgh investigates
  • While some of the changes brought about by the Domestic Abuse Act 2021 are welcome, others—such as the expansion of the offence of ‘controlling or coercive behaviour’—risk causing inconsistency in sentencing due to the overlap with existing offences.

In the October 2019 edition of Corker Binning’s The Knowledge I wrote about the (then relatively new) offence of controlling or coercive behaviour (CCB) created by the Serious Crime Act 2015 (SCA 2015). I argued that the extraordinarily wide ambit of CCB might result in its abuse by litigants in acrimonious divorce or separation proceedings. Since that article, it is this firm’s experience that the investigation and prosecution of CCB has been a mixed bag. Some allegations of CCB have been meritorious and have rightly resulted in successful convictions. Other allegations of CCB have been nakedly abusive and constructed entirely to achieve a collateral advantage in family or other proceedings.

Room for improvement?

Last year, the Home Office carried out a ‘rapid review’

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll