header-logo header-logo

25 August 2015 / Simon Duncan
Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Dodgy dealings

Where next for FX claims, asks Simon Duncan

For many litigators, news that several of the world’s largest banks had been found guilty of manipulating the foreign exchange rates by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) was thought likely to lead to a new rash of claims against those banks. Progress however, appears to have been slow.

Hurdles

In terms of the legal issues, a parallel can be drawn with claims against banks for interest rate swaps mis-selling. Many of the same legal issues arise. However, on a practical level any successful FX claim needs to get over the following additional hurdles:

Take any currency pair, sterling/dollar at 1.6044 for example (one pound buys 1.6044 dollars). A manufacturer in England selling goods to America receives payment in dollars. He buys sterling from his bank in England with those dollars. If we ignore the bid/offer spread, a million dollars buys £623,285.96 at that exchange rate.

It is alleged that the sterling/dollar rate has been manipulated, say from 1.6044 to 1.6088. This would mean that the manufacturer receives £621,581.30 for his million dollars.

If the rate was 1.6000 then

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll