header-logo header-logo

25 August 2015 / Simon Duncan
Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Dodgy dealings

Where next for FX claims, asks Simon Duncan

For many litigators, news that several of the world’s largest banks had been found guilty of manipulating the foreign exchange rates by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) was thought likely to lead to a new rash of claims against those banks. Progress however, appears to have been slow.

Hurdles

In terms of the legal issues, a parallel can be drawn with claims against banks for interest rate swaps mis-selling. Many of the same legal issues arise. However, on a practical level any successful FX claim needs to get over the following additional hurdles:

Take any currency pair, sterling/dollar at 1.6044 for example (one pound buys 1.6044 dollars). A manufacturer in England selling goods to America receives payment in dollars. He buys sterling from his bank in England with those dollars. If we ignore the bid/offer spread, a million dollars buys £623,285.96 at that exchange rate.

It is alleged that the sterling/dollar rate has been manipulated, say from 1.6044 to 1.6088. This would mean that the manufacturer receives £621,581.30 for his million dollars.

If the rate was 1.6000 then

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll