header-logo header-logo

27 April 2007 / B Mahendra
Issue: 7270 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Doc Brief

Vulnerable child witness, Unfit witnesses, Cross border regulators

CHILD WITNESSES

The position concerning child witnesses is always a difficult one. An older child may undeniably be capable of giving reliable and cogent evidence in many cases. However, the process of giving evidence, especially the procedure of cross examination, can prove traumatic to a vulnerable child. There is good research evidence to show that adverse effects could befall some children if they are called to give evidence, especially in cases involving allegations of sexual abuse. A court is therefore required to exercise great caution before summoning a child witness. In LM (A Child) (2007) EWCA Civ 9, the Court of Appeal considered how a trial judge should deal with this issue.

L is 10 years of age. In May 2005, L’s mother alleged that L had been physically abused by her father when drunk. When interviewed by the police in the presence of a social worker L had alleged that her father had physically and sexually abused her and also that he had been violent to her mother. The mother had confirmed these allegations. L had

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll