header-logo header-logo

02 March 2007 / B Mahendra
Issue: 7262 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

Doc Brief

False witness dilemmas, Importance of reasoned conclusions, Judicial review of council decisions

COMPLAINANT CREDIBILITY

The problem of false witness is especially acute where intimate situations are concerned when accounts by independent witnesses may be lacking. In those instances the behaviour of the complainant or victim may assume paramount importance. Two recent cases bearing on this issue came to the attention of the courts in different circumstances.

In R v Soroya [2006] EWCA Crim 3120, [2006] All ER (D) 152 (Dec) the appellant had been convicted of rape. He had also been acquitted of indecently assaulting the same complainant two days before the rape. He appealed on the ground that the complainant had given a false account of a earlier sexual attack on her and also that her actions since the trial raised doubts about her credibility, in that she had swiftly formed a relationship with a wealthy employer many years her senior, in circumstances similar to those in which she had met the appellant.

Motivation

The complainant was a Polish woman aged 19 who had recently arrived in Britain and was looking for work.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll