header-logo header-logo

06 November 2008
Issue: 7344 / Categories: Features , Public , Mental health
printer mail-detail

Doc brief

B Mahendra explores issues of responsibility, risk and capacity

The advent of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA 2005) means professionals of all kinds—not simply lawyers—are now conscious of the importance of bearing in mind issues of capacity whenever dealing with clients and patients, and making arrangements to determine the same if there is any doubt. Capacity, to put it at its simplest, concerns an understanding of the relevant issues and being able to come to a proper decision on the relevant matters.

The decision made needs only to be valid and it does not matter if it is eccentric, bizarre or capricious. An important issue that can arise is not capacity per se but the possible interaction between capacity and undue influence.

This phenomenon may not arise when it comes to dealing with professionals such as a lawyer in relation to litigation or a doctor when it comes to decision making in relation to whether to accept or refuse medical treatment, but assumes importance where transactions such as disposal of estates and property, where decision making can be influenced for good or ill by relations

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll