header-logo header-logo

20 November 2008
Issue: 7346 / Categories: Features , Public , Community care
printer mail-detail

Do thy duty

Kenneth Warner examines public bodies and the common law duty of care

When is it right that a public authority acting in pursuance of its statutory functions should be held accountable by way of the tort of negligence? On the consensus of contemporary case law: rarely. This is a position which is surely socially controversial.

In Jain v Trent Strategic Health Authority [2007] EWCA Civ 1186; [2008] 2 WLR 456, the Court of appeal by majority (Lady Justice Arden and Lord Justice Wilson; Lord Justice Jacob dissenting) held that no duty of care in negligence arose on the part of the defendant authority (Trent) in making an urgent ex parte application to a magistrate for immediate cancellation of the registration of the plaintiff s’ nursing home. The application was granted and the nursing home was closed.

The residents were moved to other accommodation and the Jains’ business was extinguished. Although their appeal under the statutory procedure to a registered homes tribunal succeeded, they were unable to revive it. The Jains had suffered a pure economic loss at the hands of the authority.

Criticism
The tribunal

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll