header-logo header-logo

04 November 2010
Issue: 7440 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Divorce—Financial provision—Lump sum order

Robson v Robson [2010] EWCA Civ 1171, [2010] All ER (D) 262 (Oct)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Ward, Hughes and Patten LJJ,
27 Oct 2010

The Court of Appeal has given guidance on the approach the court should adopt to divorce cases involving substantial inherited wealth.

David Balcombe QC and Nicholas Westley (instructed by Farrer & Co) for the wife., Tim Amos QC and Oliver Wise (instructed by Bircham Dyson Bell LLP) for the husband.

The parties married in 1985, when the husband was 41 and the wife 29. They had two children. The husband had substantial inherited wealth. The marriage broke down in 2006. Decree Absolute was granted in February 2010. The judge considered that important factors were: “(i) the nature and value of the assets, (ii) the lifestyle during the marriage...(iii) the expenditure of the parties during the marriage and their budgets by reference to that and their estimates of future income needs, (iv) the value of properties that were, or might be, suitable for the wife and children, and (v) the ability of the husband to raise finance to meet

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll