header-logo header-logo

10 February 2011
Issue: 7452 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Divorce—Ancillary relief—Financial provision

Jones v Jones [2011] EWCA Civ 41, [2011] All ER (D) 231 (Jan)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Sir Nicholas Wall P, Arden and Wilson LJJ, 28 Jan 2011

The Court of Appeal has overruled the decision in GW v RW (Financial Provision: Departure from Equality) EWHC 611 (Fam) [2003] All ER (D) 40 (May).

Martin Pointer QC and Geoffrey Kingscote (instructed by Mishcon de Reya) for the wife.

Lucy Stone QC and Marcus Lazarides (instructed by Levison Meltzer Pigott) for the husband.

The parties married in 1996 when the husband was the sole owner of a company which had been in operation for 10 years. They separated in 2006 and a decree absolute of divorce was made in the wife’s favour. She commenced proceedings for ancillary relief. While those proceedings were underway the husband sold the company for £25m. The net assets of the parties at the date of the hearing was £25m. The wife’s claim was for a lump sum payment by the husband of £10m. She conceded that the husband’s ownership of the company at the date of the marriage justified departure

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll