header-logo header-logo

28 November 2025 / Robert Webster
Issue: 8141 / Categories: Opinion , Crypto , Family , Divorce , Technology , Disclosure
printer mail-detail

Dividing digital assets

237027
Cryptocurrency is changing the face of divorce finances, says Robert Webster

For decades, family lawyers have dealt with a vast range of assets, from property and pensions to jewellery and pets, but now there’s something new to consider—cryptocurrency. Once a rare occurrence, digital assets are becoming increasingly prevalent in high-net-worth financial remedy cases, raising the question of whether practitioners and the law are prepared for disputes surrounding digital wealth.

Concealed wealth in cryptocurrency

Digital assets, which exist only on blockchain technology, are inherently difficult to trace, identify and value, adding an additional layer of complexity for family lawyers dealing with them in financial remedy proceedings. For some, decentralised currency has become a convenient means of concealing wealth, rousing suspicions among an increasing number of clients that their former spouse could be moving funds into cryptocurrency or digital tokens without traceability.

Indeed, Form E (financial statement for a financial order) currently has no dedicated section for digital assets, opening a door for people to deliberately omit any mention of their existence under the pretext of it being ‘accidental’. At present,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll