header-logo header-logo

26 February 2010 / David Tyme
Issue: 7406 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Divided we fall

David Tyme reports on a clash of personal belief & official duty

In Ladele v London Borough of Islington the Court of Appeal had to resolve a conflict between the right not to be discriminated against on the grounds of religion or belief, and sexual orientation (see [2009] EWCA CIP 1357, [2009] All ER (D) 148 (Dec)).

Ms Ladele commenced employment with the London Borough of Islington (LBI) in 1992. In November 2002 she became a registrar of births, marriages and deaths and as such held a statutory office.

After the introduction of the Civil Partnership Act 2004 (CPA 2004) on December 5 2005, LBI was obliged to ensure that sufficient registrars were appointed to carry out the function of civil partnership registrars. Ms Ladele, a Christian, held the view that marriage is the union of a man and a woman and therefore was unable to reconcile her faith with her duties which she viewed as enabling same-sex unions contrary to God’s Law.

Prior to CPA 2004 coming into force, Ms Ladele made it known to her employers that she would not wish to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll