header-logo header-logo

05 February 2009
Issue: 7355 / Categories: Features , Profession , Technology
printer mail-detail

Disruptive technologies

Law firms should use emerging technologies to boost productivity, says Greg Wildisen

It is not that long ago that technology and lawyers seemed about as compatible as oil and water. Many saw the emergence of technologies such as email and time-recording systems as challenges to long cherished ways of working while others regarded technology as a fundamental threat to their business models. Fast forward a few years, and the picture is very different indeed. Formerly late adopters, today many law firms are now ahead of other professionals in their use of technology as they have realised the genuine benefits it can provide for a knowledge industry.

Progress
Technological progress continues unabated and a range of new tools and systems is again transforming the way that lawyers work. Law firms have already exploited technology as a means for making traditional processes—communicating with clients, time recording and workflow management, for example—much more efficient, but the deployment of information technology is now rapidly moving past this point as new technologies enter the mainstream.

Chief amongst these are so-called “collaborative” technologies which can unlock value by enabling individualistic lawyers to work

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll