header-logo header-logo

22 September 2011 / Dr Nicholas Roberts
Issue: 7482 / Categories: Features , Landlord&tenant , Human rights
printer mail-detail

A dish to savour?

Nicholas Roberts queries the existence of a human right to a satellite TV dish

A 2008 ruling of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) finding Sweden in breach of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention) has come to prominence as a result of recent coverage in the Mail on Sunday and The Sunday Times.

In the Swedish case the tenants of a flat had erected a satellite dish in breach of their tenancy agreement. The landlord took enforcement action, which the Swedish courts upheld. The ECtHR held that Sweden was in breach of its obligations under the Convention under Art 10, dealing with the right to freedom of expression: this includes the right to receive and impart information and ideas. The newspapers may have come across the case because the Equality and Human Rights Commission has included a similar (though rather more compelling) scenario in its leaflet: Human rights at home:

Guidance for social housing providers: “Example: A social housing provider’s standard terms of tenancy prevent the erection of any satellite dish or aerial on the exterior of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll