header-logo header-logo

17 May 2012 / Adam Craggs
Issue: 7514 / Categories: Features , Tax , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Discovery channel

Adam Craggs analyses HMRC’s latest defeat in the First-tier Tribunal

Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (HMRC) are able to raise what are colloquially called “discovery” assessments under s 29 of the Taxes Management Act 1970 (TMA 1970). This is a topical issue at the moment among tax practitioners and there have been a number of important cases in recent months. The latest taxpayer to successfully challenge the validity of a discovery assessment is Anthony While (While v HMRC [2012] UKFTT 58 (TC)).

Background

Before considering While’s case, it may be helpful to remind ourselves of the relevant statutory provisions. As readers will be aware, under s 9A of TMA 1970, HMRC may enquire into a taxpayer’s self-assessment return if they notify the taxpayer of their intention to do so:

  • up to the end of the period of 12 months after the day on which the return was delivered if the return was delivered on or before the filing date;
  • up to and including the quarter day next following the first anniversary of the day on which the return was delivered, if the
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll