header-logo header-logo

Discount rate reset cuts long-term lump sum damages

04 December 2024
Issue: 8097 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury , Damages , Compensation
printer mail-detail
The Lord Chancellor Shabana Mahmood has raised the personal injury discount rate (PIDR)—used by the courts to calculate lump sum awards for long-term injuries—from -0.25% to 0.5%.

The change, announced this week, is effective from 11 January 2025, and matches rates set in Northern Ireland and Scotland.

While the independent expert panel advising the Lord Chancellor recommended a rate between 0.5% and 1%, Mahmood considered ‘the likelihood of under-compensation with all rates above 0.5% to be too high’.

At 0.5%, ‘the three core claimants modelled will have, at least, an approximately 55% chance of receiving full compensation or more,’ she said, in her statement of reasons for the change.

‘They also each have no more than a 25% chance of significant under-compensation. At this rate, no core claimant is more likely to be undercompensated than over-compensated, which I consider an appropriate outcome.’

According to the Medical Defence Union (MDU), the change could save the NHS millions of pounds in compensation payments.

David Pranklin, MDU head of claims, said: ‘In recent years, changes in the PIDR have led to a huge increase in the cost of clinical negligence claims.

‘This has had serious implications for the NHS, and for MDU members who have been shouldered with the increased costs. This change will provide some relief in the current difficult medico-legal climate.’

However, Gordon Dalyell, treasurer of the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers, said: ‘Even under the current rate of -0.25 per cent, we know that a third of people with life-changing injuries will not meet the costs of their necessary care and support.

‘Any increase in the discount rate makes it more likely that more injured people will be undercompensated. People with catastrophic injuries are particularly susceptible to the rising costs of living we’re seeing across the board, which includes increases to carer wages and the cost of specialist aids and equipment.’

Issue: 8097 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury , Damages , Compensation
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

North west team expands with senior private client and property hires

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Firm boosts corporate team in Newcastle to support high-growth technology businesses

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll