header-logo header-logo

11 April 2018
Issue: 7788 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Discount rate concerns persist

Government struggling to define what full compensation means

A senior lawyer has called for the Lord Chancellor to be held to his commitments on the personal injury discount rate through an amendment to the Civil Liability Bill.

The discount rate, which is set by the Lord Chancellor, is used to calculate likely investment return on damages awarded to a claimant with serious injuries who may need lifelong care.

Writing in NLJ this week, Julian Chamberlayne, partner at Stewarts, welcomes the government’s commitment that the Lord Chancellor will explain the reasons for any new rate in future, including publishing the panel of experts’ report and impact assessments.

However, Chamberlayne warns: ‘To ensure these commitments are not forgotten Schedule A1 to the Civil Liability Bill requires careful scrutiny and amendment, as for instance, it only requires publication of such information as the Lord Chancellor thinks appropriate.’

In terms of numbers, Chamberlayne considers that ‘once tax and investment charges are factored in it is difficult to see now how that rate could exceed 0% and it may well remain negative’. He cites Government Actuary Department figures published in July 2017 that predict a 0% rate would leave about 26% of claimants undercompensated.

The Bill also provides for claimants to receive fixed amounts of compensation for whiplash injuries. Separately, the small claims limit for road traffic accident cases will be raised from £1,000 to £5,000, pushing most whiplash cases to the small claims track, where claimants cannot claim for their legal costs. Both proposals have alarmed lawyers.

Neille Ryan, partner at Furley Page, said: ‘Whiplash awards will be slashed to a few hundred pounds and almost no legal costs will be recoverable by most claimants, who will have to pay lawyers themselves out of their damages, or take on the insurer and their solicitors alone.’

Issue: 7788 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll