header-logo header-logo

31 May 2022
Issue: 7981 / Categories: Legal News , Disclosure , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Disclosure & victims’ privacy

The disclosure guidelines have been changed to stop ‘invasive and disproportionate’ requests for victims’ private information during criminal investigations

The Annual Review of Disclosure, published last week by the Solicitor General, Alex Chalk QC, clarifies that third-party material such as therapy notes and medical records must only be sought where ‘appropriate, proportionate, and balanced with the right to privacy’. Investigators and prosecutors must give justification in writing before they can access such information.

Investigators are to be given guidance on redaction to meet data protection duties in a proportionate way, case files are to be simplified to avoid duplication between investigators, and videos can be clipped and cropped so the CPS is only given relevant information.

Meanwhile, the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has advised victims of rape and other crimes not to delay therapy for any reason connected to the police investigation or case.

It published updated pre-trial therapy guidance last week which sought to alleviate victims concerns that accessing counselling could damage the prosecution case. The Guidance on Pre-trial Therapy highlights ‘the health and wellbeing of the victim should always determine decision making with regards to pre-trial therapy’, and warns that criminal justice practitioners should ‘play no role’ in this decision beyond alerting victims to the availability of therapy. However, it cautions that some therapies such as group therapy could present difficulties and may need specific consideration.

The guidance asks police and prosecutors to give ‘very serious consideration as to whether requesting therapy notes represents a reasonable line of enquiry. What is reasonable will depend on the circumstances of the case’. It bans ‘unfocused requests to browse patients’ files’ and insists on compliance with all relevant data protection laws. The therapy notes will only be disclosed to the defence if they contain ‘material capable of undermining the prosecution case or assisting the suspect’.

The guidance also covers the impact of trauma on a victim’s memory and demeanour to help address concerns about inconsistencies in victims’ accounts during therapy.

Siobhan Blake, CPS lead for rape and serious sexual assault prosecutions, said: ‘Balancing a victim’s right to privacy with a suspect’s right to a fair trial is a sensitive issue.’

Issue: 7981 / Categories: Legal News , Disclosure , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll