header-logo header-logo

31 May 2022
Issue: 7981 / Categories: Legal News , Disclosure , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Disclosure & victims’ privacy

The disclosure guidelines have been changed to stop ‘invasive and disproportionate’ requests for victims’ private information during criminal investigations

The Annual Review of Disclosure, published last week by the Solicitor General, Alex Chalk QC, clarifies that third-party material such as therapy notes and medical records must only be sought where ‘appropriate, proportionate, and balanced with the right to privacy’. Investigators and prosecutors must give justification in writing before they can access such information.

Investigators are to be given guidance on redaction to meet data protection duties in a proportionate way, case files are to be simplified to avoid duplication between investigators, and videos can be clipped and cropped so the CPS is only given relevant information.

Meanwhile, the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has advised victims of rape and other crimes not to delay therapy for any reason connected to the police investigation or case.

It published updated pre-trial therapy guidance last week which sought to alleviate victims concerns that accessing counselling could damage the prosecution case. The Guidance on Pre-trial Therapy highlights ‘the health and wellbeing of the victim should always determine decision making with regards to pre-trial therapy’, and warns that criminal justice practitioners should ‘play no role’ in this decision beyond alerting victims to the availability of therapy. However, it cautions that some therapies such as group therapy could present difficulties and may need specific consideration.

The guidance asks police and prosecutors to give ‘very serious consideration as to whether requesting therapy notes represents a reasonable line of enquiry. What is reasonable will depend on the circumstances of the case’. It bans ‘unfocused requests to browse patients’ files’ and insists on compliance with all relevant data protection laws. The therapy notes will only be disclosed to the defence if they contain ‘material capable of undermining the prosecution case or assisting the suspect’.

The guidance also covers the impact of trauma on a victim’s memory and demeanour to help address concerns about inconsistencies in victims’ accounts during therapy.

Siobhan Blake, CPS lead for rape and serious sexual assault prosecutions, said: ‘Balancing a victim’s right to privacy with a suspect’s right to a fair trial is a sensitive issue.’

Issue: 7981 / Categories: Legal News , Disclosure , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll